PEMIDANAAN TERHADAP PIHAK YANG MENGABAIKAN PUTUSAN PENGADILAN AGAMA

Lidya Febriani

Abstract


The purpose of this research is to know the way of punishment against those who ignore the judgment of the religious court. This research uses the approach method used in legal research namely the normative juridical, that is a problem approach by examining and reviewing a legislation that is applicable and competent to is used as a basis for problem solving, so the steps in this study use  juridical logic. In this study the authors collected data  by in-depth  interview  method to 3 (three) judges  of Bengkulu Religious Court. While the method of data analysis using the framework of inductive thinking is the way of thinking by taking conclusions from the data that is special. The result of this research is that the punishment against those who ignore the decision of the Religious Court, namely: the first, through civil law that the plaintiff can file the execution of the decision of the Religious Court to the defendant. Consequently, if the execution can be exercised, the right of the defendant will be forced to be handed over to the plaintiff with the value of the decision. While the second way is by the act of punishment where the plaintiff can file a criminal complaint criminal article embezzlement. This can be done  when the defendant neglects to implement the breakup as set forth in Article 372 of the Criminal Code.


Keywords


Crime, Judgment;Religious Court

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ahmad, Abu, & Cholid Narbuko, Metodologi Penelitian, Jakarta: Bumi Angkasa, 2002.

Ali, Atabik & A. Zuhdi Muhdor, Kamus Kontemporer Arab-Indonesia, Yogyakarta: Multi Karya Grafika, 2003.

Arto, A. Mukti, Peradilan Agama dalam Sistem Ketatanegaraan Indonesia, Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2012.

Dahlan, A. Aziz, Ensiklopedi Hukum Islam, Jilid 5, Jakarta: PT. Ihtiar Baru Van Hoeve, 1996. Fauzan, M., Pokok-Pokok Hukum Acara Perdata Peradilan Agama dan Mahkamah Syar’iyah di Indonesia, Jakarta: Kencana, 2007.

Hamami, Taufiq, Kedudukan dan Eksistensi Peradilan Agama dalam Sistem Tata Hukum di Indonesia, Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 2003.

Harahap, M. Yahya, Kedudukan Kewenangan Acara Peradilan Agama Undang-Undang No. 7 Tahun 1989, Jakarta: Pustaka Kartini, 2003.

J. Supranto, Metode Penelitian Hukum dan Statistik, Jakarta: PT. Rineka Cipta, 2003.

Manan, Abdul, Penerapan Hukum Acara Perdata di Lingkungan Peradilan Agama, Jakarta: Liberty,2005.

Marzuki, Peter Mahmud, Penelitian Hukum, Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group, 2010.

Moleong, Lexy J, Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif,Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya, 2010. Munawir, Ahmad Warson, Kamus al-Munawir,

Surabaya: Pustaka Progresif, 1999.

Prakoso, Djoko & Nurwachid, Studi Tentang Pendapat-Pendapat Mengenai Efektivitas Pidana Mati Di Indonesia Dewasa Ini, Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia, 2004.

Puslitbang Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia, Naskah Akademis Penelitian Contempt of Court 2002, Jakarta: Mahkamah Agung, 2002.

Rahardjo, Satjipto, Ilmu Hukum, Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 2000.

Rasyid, Chatib & Syaifuddin, Hukum Acara Perdata dalam Teori dan Praktik pada Peradilan Agama, Yogyakarta: UII Press, 2009.

Rosyadi, Rahmat, & Soeroso Dasar, Indonesia: Keluarga Berencana Ditinjau dari Hukum Islam, Bandung: Pustaka, 2001.

Sudarto, Kapita Selekta Hukum Pidana, Bandung: Alumni, 2001.

Sutantio, Retnowulan, & Iskandar Oeripkartawinata, Hukum Acara Perdata dalam Teori dan Praktek, Bandung: Mandar Maju, 2009.

Wahyudi, Abdullah Tri, Peradilan Agama di Indonesia, Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2004. Yayasan Penyelenggara Penerjemah al-Qur’an, Al-Qur’an dan Terjemahannya Juz 1 s/d 30 (transliterasi), Bandung: Sinar Baru Algensindo,2005.

Yuslim, Hukum Acara Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2015


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Indexing oleh :