Kajian Putusan Pada Perkara Hadhanah Ditinjau Dari Undang-Undang Tentang Perlindungan Anak

Serli Herlintoni

Abstract


Abstract: Decision On The Case Study Ofhadhanah Viewed From The Law On The Protection Of Children. Fiqh scholars agree that the laws of caring for and educating children is mandatory, because if it is not cared for and well educated, will reflect badly on themselves, can even lead to losing their lives. In the case ofhadhanah decision No.34 / Pdt.G / 2014 / PA.Crp and No. 16 / Pdt.G / 2015 / PA.Crp hadhanah has granted to the mother, but the basic of its legal consideration is vary. These Differences will be recorded, analyzed philosophically and normatively. This paper will examine how the consideration of judges in deciding cases ofhadhanah No. 34 / Pdt.G / 2014 / PA.Crp and No. 16 / Pdt.G / 2015 / PA.Crp terms of Act No. 23 of 2002 on Protection of Children and legal settings. This research is a normative legal research with qualitative methods in the form of literature studies. The approach used in this study isstatute approach and case approach. Data were analyzed using comparative analysis. The results of this study indicate that in case the decision ofhadhanah No. 34 / Pdt.G / 2014 / PA.Crp and case No. 16 / Pdt.G / 2015 / PA.Crp, judges tend to pay less attention to consideration of the regulations to the Act No. 23 of 2003 on Protection of Children Jo No. 35 of 2014 regarding Child Protection. Legal arrangements in the settlement of hadhanah isverzet, appeal, and need to be applied mediation and dwangson that the defendant is willing to fulfill his promise.


Keywords


hadhanah, child protection, consideration of the judge, mediation

References


Alfons, Maria, “Implementasi Perlindungan Indikasi Geografis Atas Produk-produk Masyarakat Lokal Dalam Perspektif Hak Kekayaan Intelektual”, Ringkasan Disertasi Doktor, Malang: Universitas Brawijaya, 2010.

Effendi, Satria dan M. Zen, Problematika Hukum Keluarga Islam Kontemporer, Cet. ke-2, Jakarta: Kencana, 2004.

Hadjon, Phillipus M, Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Rakyat Indonesia, Surabaya: PT. Bina Ilmu, 1987.

Harahap, M. Yahya, Kedudukan Kewenangan dan Acara Peradilan Agama, Ed. 2, Cet.ke- 2, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2003.

Inpres No.1 Tahun 1991 tentang Kompilasi Hukum Islam.

Kinkin Mulyati, Hak Perempuan Korban Perceraian Belum Terjamin, Jakarta, http://www.hukumonline.com/berita baca, diunduh tanggal 11-2-2015

Kusnadi, Didi, Rahmat Ari Jaya, Peran Peradilan Agama Dalam Pengembangan Access to Justice di Indonesia, (Jakarta: Ditjen Badilag Mahkamah Agung RI: 2012

Marzuki, Peter Mahmud, Penelitian Hukum, Jakarta: Kencana, 2011, Cet. ke-7.

Ngani, Nico, Metodologi Penelitian dan Penulisan Hukum, Yogyakrta: Pustaka Yustisia, 2012, Cet.ke-1.

Raharjo, Satijipto, Ilmu Hukum, Bandung: PT. Citra Aditya Bakti, 2000.

Sugiyono, Metode Penelitiaan Kombinasi (Mixed Methods), Bandung: Alfabeta, 2014, Cet. ke-5.

Tim Penyusun, Ensiklopedi Hukum Islam, Jakarta: PT. Ichtiar Baru van Hoeve, 1996 Cet. ke-1.

Undang-Undang No. 1 Tahun 1974 tentang Perkawinan

Undang-Undang 23 Tahun 2002 tentang Perlindungan Anak.

Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945.

Undang-Undang No. 48 Tahun 2009 tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman

Weber dalam Soejono dan Abdurrahman, Metode Penelitian Suatu Pemikiran dan Penerapan, Jakarta: Renika Cipta, 2005.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.29300/qys.v1i1.232

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Indexing oleh :
 

  

   free web stats Qiyas Visitors