EVALUASI KEGIATAN KELOMPOK KERJA GURU (KKG) PAI DI KECAMATAN PAGAR JATI KABUPATEN BENGKULU TENGAH

Salimah Salimah

Abstract


Abstract: The problems in this study were 1) How is the evaluation of the activities carried out by teachers working group (KKG) of religious education, 2) How to Evaluate Activity of teachers working group (KKG) of religious education on the skills of teachers in teaching in the District Pagar Jati Central Bengkulu, 3) Obstacles and supporting teachers to follow the activities of teachers working group (KKG) of religious education. The method used in this research is qualitative research to uncover these problems in depth and thorough, while informants studied were administrators and members of the working group of religious education teacher residing in District Jati fence. Results of this research are activities by the working group of teachers in the district teak Fences routine nature there is no regular monthly as well when there are things that should be important if it can be weekly Mass will face semiannual then we will discussion to discuss the matter grating, preparation of RPP which will be given to students, or the Mass there is an urgent problem that must be solved together. Later in the activities of the working group also conducted seminars for teacher’s workshop of the religious education and other activities to increase knowledge and skills for the Master of religious education. Work activities teachers can help teachers’ skills in teaching activities of teachers working groups in the district of religious education teak railings so help teachers, because this activity is aimed to help teachers of religious education to be more proficient and professional in teaching, this activity is usually held one month one month 2 times, or if there are urgent as the new school year can be activities once a week.In carrying out the activities of the working group of teachers in the district Pagar Jati no problems were severe constraints only a little too did not become an obstacle in these activities.

Keywords


evaluation, the working teachers group

Full Text:

PDF

References


Al-Qur’an dan Tafsirnya. Departemen Agama RI, Jakarta, 2009

Andi, Prastowo. Menguasai Teknik-Teknik Koleksi Data Penelitian Kualitatif. Jogjakarta: Diva Press, 2010

Akhyak. Profil Pendidik Sukses. Elkaf. Surabaya . 2005

Arikunto, Suharsimi. Prosedur Penelitian, Jakarta,

Rieneka Cipta, 1999

Aziz, Munir. Program Peningkatan Mutu Pendidikan di Sekolah Dasar (Jakarta: Majalah Mutu, PEQIP, 1994

Badeni. Prilaku Organisasi. Bengkulu: MMP Bengkulu, 2009

Bafadal. Peningkatan profesionalisme guru sekolah dasar. Bumi aksara. 2006

Berlian. Efektifitas kegiatan kelompok kerja guru (KKG) Dalam meningkatkan kemampuan pembelajaran (studi pada kegiatan kerja guru gugus III Kecamatan curup timur kabupaten rejang lebong) Tesis: Teknologi pendidikan Fakultas keguruan dan ilmu pendidikan Universitas Bengkulu, 2014

Chairul Dkk, Akmal. Panduan Sistem kenaikan Pangkat Pengawas PAI pada Sekolah, jakarta: Depag, RI, 2008

Danim, Sudarwan. Menjadi Peneliti Kualitatif, Bandung, Pustaka Setia, 2000

Depdikbud. Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: Balai Pustaka, 1990

Departemen Agama RI, Pedoman Kelompok Kerja Guru Pendidikan Agama Islam Jakarta: 2008

Djamarah. Prestasi belajar dan Kompetensi Guru. Surabaya. Usaha Nasional, 2000

Gunawan. Administrasi Sekolah. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 1996

Hamalik. Proses Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta: PT.Bumi Aksara, 2004

Iskandar. Metodelogi Penelitian Kualitatif. Jakarta: Gaung Persada Prees, 2009

Mulyasa, E. Menjadi Guru Profesional. (Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya. 2005

Moleong. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Jakarta: Remaja Rosdakarya, 2001

Narbuko, Cholid. Metodologi Peneltian. Jakarta: Pustaka Setia, 2003

Nasution. Metode Research Penelitian Ilmiah. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara, 2004

Pedoman Pelaksanaan Kelompok Kerja Guru Pendidikan Agama Islam (KKG PAI) Pada Sekolah Dasar. Departemen Agama Jawa Timur.

Surabaya 1996/1997.

Pidarta. Landasan Kependidikan Stimulus Ilmu Pendidikan Bercorak Indonesia. Jakarta: PT. Bina Rineka Cipta, 199

Samana. Profesionalisme Keguruan. Kanisius. Yogyakarta. 1994.

Saefullah, Kurniawan & Sule Tisnawati. Pengantar Manajemen, jakarta: Kencana, cetakan ke-5, 2010 Sukatjo, Ibnu & Basu swashta,. Pengantar Bisnis Modern, Yogyakarta: Liberty, cetakan kesepuluh, 2002

Sugiyono, Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R & D, (Bandung, Alpabheta, 2007)

Salman, Prinsip-Prinsip Pelaksanaan KKG, (Padang: Gugus II kec. Bungus TL. Kabung, 2006

Slameto. Belajar dan Faktor-faktor Yang Mempengaruhinya. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 2010

Syaefudin. Pengembangan Profesi Guru. Bandung: CV. Alfabeta, 2009

Sarah Sarwati. Pengaruh Kinerja Supervisor dan kegiatan Kelompok Kerja Guru terhadap peningkatan kompetensi professional Guru PAI di SD Negeri 2 Cirebon (Tesis, Fakultas Tarbiyah, IAIN Sunan Gunung Jati, 2013

Suryabrata, Sumadi. Metodologi Penelitian. Jakarta: Rajagrafindo Persada.2010

Thoha, Miftah. Prilaku Organisasi. Jakarta: Pustaka Setia, 2008

Uzer. Prilaku Organisasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: PT Gramedia, 1997

Uzman uzer moh. Menjadi guru profesional. Bandung:Remaja rosdakarya.1995

Komaruddin. Ensiklopedi. Jakarta:Bumi Aksara,1994 http://niladwipsikologi.wordpress.com/2010/11/07/ pembentukan-struktur-kelompok-tahap-norming/ (diakses pada tanggal 21 april 2015)




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.29300/btu.v2i1.302

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Indexed by :

   Garuda

 

free web stats al-bahtsu Visitors