Peer Review Process

Jurnal Ilmiah Mizani: Wacana Hukum, Ekonomi dan Keagamaan, is a peer- reviewed journal (Double-Blind Review) that concerns with the field of Islamic studies under six main topics including (1) Islamic Law, (2) Islamic Economy law, (3) Islamic Family law, (4) Islamic Criminal Law, (5) Islamic Jurisprudence, and (6) Law Studies

 The article may be written with two types; research and conceptual idea. The research comprises scholarly reports that enhance knowledge regarding islamic studies of the six topics. This may include articles that report results of  quantitative or qualitative research studies.The conceptual  idea  publishes articles conceptually  relevant to the Islamic studies in accordance with the present theories, models, or philosophical  position in such Islamic studies

The review process

The submitted manuscript is first reviewed by an editor. It will be evaluated in the office, whether it is suitable for our focus and scope or has a major methodological flaw. This manuscript will be sent to at least two anonymous reviewers (Double-Blind Review). Reviewers' comments are then sent to the corresponding author for necessary actions and responses. The suggested decision will be evaluated in an editorial board meeting. Afterwards, the editor will send the final decision to the corresponding author.

Peer-reviewer Selection

Reviewer selection is essential for publication process based on many factors, including expertise, reputation, specific recommendations and our experience of reviewing the publication process.  Furthermore, we ensure the potential reviewers before sending them manuscripts to review.

Writing the review

The main purpose of the review is to provide the editors with the information needed to determine the accepted manuscripts. The review should also advise the authors as to how they can rewrite for better paper to comply with editorial requirements. As far as possible, a negative review should explain to the authors the weaknesses of their manuscript, so that rejected authors can understand the basis for the decision and see in broad terms what needs to be done to improve the manuscript. This is secondary to the other functions, however, and referees should not feel obliged to provide detailed, constructive advice to the authors of papers that do not meet the criteria for the journal (as outlined in the letter from the editor when asking for the review).

Anonymity

We conduct double-blind review so to authors and the reviewer unknown each other. Unless the reviewers feel so strongly to identify the author, nonetheless, we prefer that reviewers are anonymous throughout the review process and beyond.

Peer-review publication policies

All contributions submitted to the specialists for education area that are selected for peer-review. No less than two selected reviewers read the propective articles.